In many parts of the world, especially places that are
predominantly English-speaking (United States, Australia, United Kingdom), the
most common response to human fat is hostility.
This sometimes takes the guise of concern (“I’m worried about your
health”), and is usually justified with the solid mass of research that states
excess fat is dangerous, and the public policy that is based on it. [By the way, if you read the news these days,
you will notice that things are shifting: there are still many reports on the “dangers”
of obesity, but there are more and more reports on how these dangers are
overblown or totally incorrect, and how wrong it is to base your opinion about
someone’s health on their physical appearance: thin doesn’t automatically mean
healthy and fat does not automatically mean unhealthy.]
The times, they are a-changin’, but the majority opinion is
still righteously anti-fat. If you are
fat at all, you must constantly face people who may or may not be silently
judging you primarily on your weight. In
an earlier post [The White (Wo)man’s Burden], I wrote about how being white in
a white-dominated society tends to make people blind or dismissive of the
experiences of non-white people in the society.
It isn’t usually deliberate callousness or cruelty; it’s more about everyone
living within their own bubble of experience and perception. Very few people have the imagination or
empathy to be willing and able to picture what someone else’s life might be
like, especially if it is very unlike theirs.
For example, homeless people. Few
of them deliberately chose to be homeless; most of them would prefer not to
be. There are occasional stories in the news
about how a respectable person with a job and a home lost first one than the
other and could find no more work and no place safe to stay. Reading these stories, the first impulse is
to reject them as unrelatable to us: there’s no way we would lose our job and be unable to find employment; there’s no
way we would live in our car or on
the street. The people we’re reading
about must be different in some way; there must be something blameworthy about
them, that is the real reason they
are in these situations.
The same thing is true for fat, in places where fat isn’t
admired. Being fat, in the majority
opinion, is as contemptible and preventable as being homeless. Being fat is more contemptible to many than
being a drug or alcohol addict, which is kind of funny when you stop to think
about it. I think two of the reasons for
that are that people are still stuck simplemindedly associating fat with
badness (moral weakness, poor health, ugliness), whereas drug addicts are more
likely to be thin (which is always
good), and there is danger and romance associated with drug and alcohol
addiction: musicians like Keith Richards and Iggy Pop, with their wiry, sinewy
bodies, their talent, their fame and their hard-living ways, and Ernest
Hemmingway, with his robust, hyper-masculinity: his wartime experiences, his
dangerous stints in journalism, his world traveling, his many wives and his
terse, understated prose. Whether you
live or die due to drugs and alcohol, there is a darkness associated with the
addiction that is generally considered interesting to outsiders; a badness that
has nothing to do with the boring, despicable, squishy badness of perceived
overindulgence in food.
This is where self-hatred becomes socially valuable. Since more people draw negative conclusions about
heavy people, based on their size alone, it helps the heavy person socially if
they seem to agree with the majority opinion.
You know this is true under any circumstance: if you are a Republican in
a crowd of Democrats or a Democrat in a crowd of Republicans and you just want
to get along with these people on a social basis, you avoid stirring the pot
with your opinions. Most of us know we
can’t convert the world by stating our opinion and most of us would prefer, in
a low-stakes situation like a cocktail party, to avoid antagonizing other
party-goers. If you hate heavy metal or
classical music, but someone you are interested in loves one or the other and
invites you to go to a concert, chances are you will do it with a reasonable
assumption of interest, because the person is more important to you than the
event.
In both these cases you have opportunities to discover the
opinion of others before acknowledging your own tastes and beliefs, and you can
make choices about whether or not to admit to preferring something the people
around you don’t like. When you are fat,
you don’t. If you are fat at all, in
fat-hating places, you know that some, maybe many people are looking down on
your for your weight. If you are
comfortable with yourself as you are, if you don’t express hatred and despair
over your own body and the fervent desire to change it, the contempt
solidifies. If, on the other hand, you complain
about your weight, talk about the diet you’re on or plan to start, and other
things that signify that you are not satisfied with yourself, the contempt
abates (slightly). The other person
knows that you are aware you are terribly flawed and that you are trying to do
something about it. They may pity you
for being so weak as to get fat in the first place, but they will approve of
you for trying to conquer it. This, by
the way, is also where the food-watching comes in. Whether you are with people you know or
strangers, if you are heavy, some people will quietly monitor your food, making
silent (or voiced) judgments about whether or not you are eating as you
should. If you have lost 100 pounds and
maintained that loss for a year, but you’re still visibly fat and you eat
something sweet in front of strangers, all they will see is a fat person eating
something they shouldn’t. This is a big
reason that many heavy people eat delicious things in secret, with feelings of
anxiety, sadness, deprivation and a sense of getting away with something. Thin people (except celebrities) usually don’t have to deal with
this: no one questions the thin person’s
hamburger, fries, diet coke and hot fudge sundae. Since it doesn’t show on their body,
obviously they know what they’re doing with food. Maybe they do: maybe they have naturally
supercharged metabolic processes, or maybe they’ve undereaten recently and need
more food—or maybe they’re exercise bulimics, spending four hours a day in the
gym to work off the calories, or they’re food bulimics and frantically stuffing
themselves with delicious things they know they won’t allow their body to keep.
The point is, self-hating fat people are conforming to the
mores of the majority opinion.
Self-hatred doesn’t come out of nowhere.
As people we are taught to obey the rules of our society, no matter how
bizarre, and we generally do it because it is much more comfortable to be
accepted than to be ostracized. We all
want to be seen in a positive light and when we can’t be, for some perceived
flaw, we either affiliate with other people who share that flaw, or we do whatever we
can to minimize it with the majority (or both).
There is a saying: two wrongs don’t
make a right. In the case of social
relationships, they often do. Two wrongs
seem to work like multiplying negative numbers in Algebra: -2 x -2 = 4 (not
-4). This sort of social mathematics is
unfortunate, since it tends to force people into molds, rather than allowing
for individuality.
Taking it down to brass tacks: self-hatred is a defense
mechanism designed to help people get along with those who hate them. It works (sort of), but it also destroys.
Insightful. I come from a family which includes one morbidly obese brother. When we do the family dinners at our local all-you-can-eat buffet, well, you can imagine the looks and not-always-quiet commentary he and his equally large wife enjoy. He told me once he felt like carrying a card to hand to people making snide comments, showing a chart of his progress. It's a long journey and he's finally decided NOT to apologize for himself. The continuous mea culpa certainly didn't help him. Not that he has learned NOT to constantly self-loathe and knock himself down, he has progresses beautifully. PS like your social mathematics comment.
ReplyDeleteSophie.